olympus viewer 3 fisheye correction greyed out

OLYMPUS VIEWER 3 FISHEYE CORRECTION GREYED OUT FREE

Telas mosquiteiras também impedem a entrada de insetos peçonhentos como as aranhas e os escorpiões, estes insetos também oferecem risco, pois seu veneno em poucos minutos podem levar uma criança a morte. Tela mosquiteira é indispensável no combate a mosquitos transmissores de doenças.Ī dengue, por exemplo, já matou centenas de pessoas só na capital de São Paulo e um pequeno investimento em nossas Muitos destes insetos são transmissores de doenças e a Telas mosquiteiras garantem um sono tranquilo a toda família, livrando e protegendo-nas dos mais diversos insetos. DeleteĪs Telas mosquiteiras garantem ar puro por toda casa livrando-a completamente dos mosquitos e insetos indesejáveis. The problem may be there, I am not denying it, I never did, but overemphasising on the problem is also a problem on its own, which I have observed in lengthy forum discussions. This brings me back to my original comment on 'being overly critical'. Honestly, viewing my images at 100% from that entry, with the bird photos showing all the fine details of the feathers, even if there was slight shutter shock, it was completely fine. It is sometimes not easy to spot (it does take trained eyes to spot the problem). Did it make me less confident? No, I went all out and shot almost a thousand images. I made a mistake of assuming that the firmware was upgraded but it has not, hence there was no AntiShock '0 second' function (which is the electronic first curtain shutter) available.

I used E-M10, which has identical shutter mechanism as the E-M5. The latest example I can give you is using the 75-300mm II. Did that stop them from taking awesome photos? Nope. I have friends using Canon, Nikon, Sony and all sorts of cameras and they all admit there are incidences of shutter shock. Nonetheless, I do not see how his is better or worse than other cameras. I am not saying that we should not innovate and solve this issue, it clearly will be addressed since it has been blown out of proportion.

OLYMPUS VIEWER 3 FISHEYE CORRECTION GREYED OUT FREE

I have published thousands of photographs on my blog, and each and every one of them I made sure were perfectly sharp and free of shake of any kind. Even if the shutter shock happened, it never cause any huge impact that would render my image useless. I have used the E-M1 and E-M5 extensively and did not find any issue at all. Just pin-pointing the problem on Olympus is NOT fair. Shutter Shock has ALWAYS been around in any cameras with mechanical shutter, including ALL DSLR. I have to respectfully disagree with you. i'm shooting more with my fantastic trusty E-M5 and a little less with my E-M1. It makes a very noticeable difference (between a sharp and totally blurred image) with some bodies. So my advice to E-M1 users would be: If you think you're somehow shaking the camera, or, if you think 'wow, how could I have missed focus so badly ?!', then please set 0 second anti shock and select the single-frame with the diamond. Regrettably Olympus haven't (either can't or won't) enabled this fix in anything other than single exposure mode.

Had Olympus not provided this firm-ware work around this the camera would have had to be returned. At least one in four of the images from my E-M1 are unusable (if the shutter speed is <= +-1/500) unless I enable the 0 second anti shock to use First Curtain Electronic Shutter. I do disagree with your one observation though: 'some of us being overly critical of shutter shock' is, with the greatest of respect, an understatement of the extent of this problem. Hi Robin, thanks for all your helpful suggestions.

Olympus viewer 3 fisheye correction greyed out